Professional Opera Singers’ Voice Disorders In Relation To Voice Type

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/004

Professional Opera Singers’ Voice Disorders In Relation To Voice Type

  • Pedro Clarós 1*
  • Iwona Porebska 1
  • Astrid Clarós-Pujol 1
  • Carmen Pujol 1
  • Andrés Clarós 1
  • Konrad Kaczmarek 2

1 Clarós Otorhinolaryngology Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
2 Department of Applied Mathematics of the Silesian Technical University, Gliwice, Poland

*Corresponding Author: Pedro Clarós, Clarós Clinic, c./Vergós 31, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.

Citation: Clarós P., Porebska L., Astrid C Pujol., Pujol C., Clarós A., Kaczmarek K. (2019) Professional Opera Singers’ Voice Disorders In Relation To Voice Type. J.Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study. 2(1); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/004

Copyright: © 2019 Pedro Clarós, Clarós Clinic, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 29 August 2019 | Accepted: 16 October 2019 | Published: 04 November 2019

Keywords: opera singers; voice disorders; voice types; vocal fold pathologies; tessitura

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether there is a relationship between the voice type and the prevalence of voice disorders, and to investigate the frequency of laryngological controls and voice rehabilitation amongst professional opera singers.

Study design: Cohort study, composed of a survey, videolaryngoscopy and videostroboscopy.

Setting: Referral center (Clarós Otorhinolaryngology Clinic)

Subject and methods: Highly professional opera singers performing in the Gran Teatro del Liceo in Barcelona, were divided into 7 study groups based on their voice types. Study was composed of a survey about singing and voice care habits, followed by videolaryngoscopy and videostroboscopy determining the prevalence of voice disorders.

Results: We examined 70 opera singers (30 females, 40 males; aged 19-70), divided into 7 equally numerous study groups based on their voice types. The prevalence of voice disorders was the highest amongst sopranos, i.e. 50% (50%,95%,CI:12-88,SD=.53), in comparison to 20% (20%,95%,CI:10-50,SD=.42) amongst countertenors, tenors and baritones, 10% (10%,95%,CI:13-33,SD=.32) amongst contraltos and mezzo-sopranos, and 0% amongst basses. Statistical significance was confirmed for difference between the group of the highest female and highest male voice (soprano and countertenor), and the group of the lowest female and lowest male voice, i.e. contralto and bass (Z=2.32,P=.02). Frequency of attending laryngological appointments and voice rehabilitation was generally very low, although was highest amongst sopranos.

Conclusion: Results supported our hypothesis that the higher voices are at a heightened risk of having voice disorders. It can start the process of evaluating actual risk of vocal fold pathologies that opera singers are exposed to during their careers.

Results:

We examined 70 highly professional opera singers, aged between 19 to 70 years old, with the average age of 41.77 years old (41.77,95%,CI:38.95-44.60,SD=11.85), divided into 7 study groups of 10 opera singers based on their voice types. From the initial group of 92, 22 singers were excluded, mostly because of chronic laryngeal reflux disease. There were not statistically significant differences in the distribution of age between the groups (H=2.27,P=.89) and singing experience, i.e. years of singing (H=3.07,P=.80).

The prevalence of voice disorders was the highest in the group of soprano singers, i.e. it was 50% (50%,95%,CI:12-88,SD=.53); they were two hematomas, two cases of voice fatigue and one case of nodules. A much lower prevalence of 20% (20%,95%,CI:10-50,SD=.42) was found for the group of countertenors (one case of voice fatigue and one of nodules), the same for tenors (one polyp and one case of nodules) and baritones (two cases of vocal edema). A prevalence of 10% (10%,95%,CI:13-33,SD=.32) was found for contralto singers as well as for mezzo-soprano singers (in both cases the pathologies were polyps). There were no vocal fold pathologies found amongst bass singers. Statistical significance was confirmed for difference between the group created from the highest female and the highest male voice, i.e. soprano and countertenor, and the group created from the lowest female and the lowest male voice, i.e. contralto and bass (Z=2.32,P=.02). Figure 1 shows it graphically

Legend of figures:
Figure 1.
The comparison of the prevalence of voice disorders between the groups of highest and lowest female and male voices.

Discussion:

Our results confirmed the hypothesis, that there is a relationship between the type of voice that an opera singer has and the prevalence of vocal fold pathologies, i.e. in our study the prevalence of voice disorders was distinctly highest in the group of soprano singers and it dropped with the fundamental frequency of the singers’ tessitura (it was the lowest for the lowest voice, i.e. bass). There can be couple of reasons of this observation. Firstly, as we confirmed before in our different study, soprano singers’ vocal folds are the shortest,[40] and while singing they are being extended the most. At the same time they are also the most exposed to incredible strain while singing the highest frequencies. Finally, we are tempted to claim, that soprano parts play a special role in operas, and usually soprano arias are the longest and the most demanding, therefore affect vocal folds the most.

Our findings are in agreement with what we have observed during our years of providing medical support for the opera singers; however, several doubts warrant discussion. Firstly, there are differences between the singers that are difficult to evaluate, however might have affected their vocal folds. For example: lifestyle, addictions, living environment, individual differences between physiology and anatomy of the larynx, or performance technique and lack or presence of voice training.[8] Another doubt warrant discussion is the difficulty in comparing all types of voices, as they vary between the genders not only in pitch and vocal range, but also voice box anatomy. We decided the best way to evaluate prevalence of voice disorders in relation to voice type is to compare the group of singers with the highest female and the highest male voice with the group of singers with the lowest female and the lowest male voice. Statistical significance was confirmed for this difference. However, there is room left for further investigation and exploring this relationship for all the possible combinations of voice types.

From another point of view, we find the results related to the frequency of voice rehabilitation and laryngologists appointments very interesting. As we can see again, the higher the fundamental frequency of opera singers’ tessitura, the more frequent laryngological appointments and voice rehabilitations are. Presumably that might be connected to our first finding, i.e. the higher prevalence of voice disorders in the high voice group, however in future another study establishing the difference in consciousness about importance of voice care between the singers might be interesting. Nevertheless, what is the most surprising is the generally low frequency of laryngological appointments and voice rehabilitation in the group of opera singers, which is opposite to what has been described before.[32,46-48] Surprisingly, as many as 33% opera singers claim to never, very rarely or rarely see ENT specialists, despite the fact that it has become well accepted that they highly cherish their voices and worry about their condition a lot.[26,28] Expectedly, it raises the question of the reason of this outcome. We agree with Kwak et al. that the research about the effect of professional singing on the vocal folds is still very limited and the subject is still not exhausted. [8] This might be one reason why professional singers are unaware of the importance of regular laryngological examinations. Presumably, although they know the risk factors, they do not have specific knowledge about the actual significance of them (e.g. there is a high rate of opera singers who drink alcohol and smoke), as well as about which group of opera singers is more vulnerable to the voice disorders. Although the subject of professional singing seems to have received a reasonable amount of attention in scientific investigation, it is wide enough to still have some areas in which exploration is lacking. Kwak et al. explored changes in acoustic parameters before and after opera performances, however without evaluating long-term effects and without distinguishing singers’ voice types. [8] Phyland et al. checked the prevalence of voice disorders in singing groups in comparison to non-singing ones, and compared the groups singing in opera, musical theatre and “contemporary-other-than-rock” singing group, however did not compare the groups of singers with different tessitura. [28] Chernobelsky evaluated the results of voice therapy amongst professional classical singers with vocal fold nodules, but without dividing them by tessitura, and without evaluating the prevalence of this disorder.[27] Pacheco and Behlau investigated the immediate impact of vocal demand, but distinction according to tessitura was also beyond the scope of the research.[26] Mayerhoff et al. studied different types of tessitura, but only in the context of the presence of supraglottic hyperfunction not voice disorders, however they suggested the correlation between one and another.[49] Thus, we are tempted to claim that our research explores aspects not addressed before.

Conclusion:

The beautiful voice which opera singers are characterized by is an amazing gift and instrument to make lots of people happy and fulfilled, including opera singers themselves while they follow their great passion of singing. However it is also a blessing that is easy to lose, simply because of following this passion. It is therefore also the subject of instant worry. However, because of the dearth of general knowledge in the subject, they are unaware of the actual risk for their vocal folds and the possible benefits of counteractions, and they don’t attend laryngologist appointments or voice rehabilitation enough. We believe it is therefore important for the population of opera singers to evaluate the actual risk that they are exposed to over the years of their career, which might encourage them to control their vocal folds more often and comfort them with regular voice rehabilitation. Our study attempted to start the process of this evaluation and to emphasize the importance of this subject.

Acknowledgement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors report no financial and material support for the research and the work reported in the manuscript.

Introduction

For many people, including the authors of this article, music is one of the most important things and one of the strongest experiences in their lives. [1] It can determine mood, create emotions, [2-6] construct memories [4-7] and help in their recall, [6,7] remove barriers between people and help them connect, [1] and even modulate the autonomic nervous system, the hormonal system and the immune system. [6] Beyond the shadow of a doubt, classical music, especially opera which is composed not only by singing but also acting, is a particularly important type of music as it is the most connected to human cultural heritage and, according to many, is especially moving. [2,8,9] Opera performance has always been a magical ritual, emphasized not only by the beautiful buildings characterized by incredible architecture that opera always takes place in, and the savoir-vivre that tells us to dress in a particularly elegant way while attending opera performances, but also by the special respect and adoration that opera singers have always been honored with.

Our clinic has been a widely known consultancy for professional opera singers performing in the Gran Teatro del Liceo in Barcelona and other opera theatres in Europe since 1970. For all of these years we have had the pleasure of sharing many moments of joy with opera singers during their performances, but also many moments of fear and dread when the overuse of voice has caused voice disorders, as there is no doubt that those incredible performances are also superhuman efforts for the voice box, its anatomy as well as physiology. [8] During these years we have noticed a relationship between the type of tessitura that an opera singer is classified to and the prevalence of voice disorders. Therefore we decided to check the presence of this relationship in a cohort study and to make it its objective.

A few words regarding voice disorders warrant mentioning to clarify the subject of our concerns while taking medical care of opera singers. Pathologies caused by trauma, previous intubation and surgery, or neurogenic and infectious causes are beyond the scope of this text, and they were not present in our research group. Likewise congenital disorders were not present in our patients, which is not surprising taking into consideration how carefully selected opera singers are, and that by definition they are free of voice problems at the beginning of their careers. On the contrary, functional voice disorders (defined as dysphonia without structural or neurological vocal fold pathology [10]), are quite common amongst professional singers. They contain muscle tension dysphonia, vocal fatigue (strictly associated with vocal tiredness after voice overuse or misuse [11]), and psychogenic dysphonia, if the cause of laryngeal tension is psychological, [12] however many authors do not single them out separately. [13-15] The reason for functional voice disorders is a disproportion in the laryngeal and perilaryngeal muscular activity, [10,12-15] and apart from psychological reasons it can be caused by voice overuse, bad adaptation, incorrect voice technique, or increased vocal tone.[12]  Typically, functional voice disorders are characterized by a harsh, strained voice of increased effort, decreased volume and unsettled pitch, poor voice control, odynophonia, tenderness in the thyrohyoid space, and tension in neck and shoulders. [11,13,19-26] They are usually treated with voice and behavioral therapy. [10,13, 16-19]

Organic pathologies include benign lesions like nodules, polyps, cysts and hematomas, as well as vocal edema. Nodules typically apply to the free edge at the border of the anterior and middle thirds of the fold and are caused by initial trauma during contact between opposing surfaces of vocal folds, especially during voice overuse, [12,27-29] and as if in a vicious cycle are aggravated by a following dysphonia causing constant strain and muscle tension and vocal fold weight change, that causes further whip-like trauma. They are structured by fibronectin deposits in superficial lamina propria combined with a relocation of thicker collagen type IV from the basement membrane after its injury. [30] Similar lesions are retention or epidermoid cysts, which are typically unilateral and in contrast to nodules do not improve with vocal therapy.[31]  Hematomas, most common in the case of female professional singers,[32-34]  are the consequence of vocal abuse or physical trauma, when submucosal blood vessels rupture and bleed into the superficial layer of lamina propria, with the main symptom being dysphonia, [32,35-37] and are normally treated with total voice rest, being directed to surgery only in the case of recurrent hematomas. [32,33,35] The last pathology within the range of interest of this article is vocal edema, caused by over-vibration during voice overuse or misuse that results in the reduction of blood perfusion, intermittent hypoxia and regional inflammation, and is treated with strict voice rest. [38]

Materials and Methods

The study protocol was acknowledged, reviewed and approved by the internal ethics committee of our medical center, Clarós Otorhinolaryngology Clinic Institutional Review Board. All of the singers were informed about the examination technique and provided written informed consent. The subject of our study were highly professional, international opera singers performing in the Gran Teatro del Liceo in Barcelona, divided into 7 equally numerous study groups based on their voice types: soprano, mezzo-soprano, contralto, countertenor, tenor, baritone and bass. We decided to include countertenor in our study although it is not always singled out as a separate tessitura, as countertenors are usually characterized by tenor, baritone or more rarely bass speaking voices, but underwent a special training to be able to use a falsetto-based  vocal  technique in order to sing contralto, mezzo-soprano, or soprano parts. [39,40]   Exclusion criteria were applied to ensure that no factor other than singing could influence voice, i.e. medications or any medical condition that might cause edema or paralysis of vocal folds, history of neck trauma, and current allergic reaction or sickness. We also excluded singers with chronic laryngeal reflux disease, although the prevalence of this disease is extremely high in opera singers and is even suggested to be occupation related disease.[41-45] Cases of stage fright (described widely by Spahn and Echternach [9]) and voice problems related to psychological causes were excluded too.

The first limb of the study was completion of a specially constructed survey asking about age and singing experience (i.e. the number of years that they had sung for), to ensure that the differences between the groups were statistically insignificant. The next set of questions related to the presence of any diagnosed voice disorders, and to the frequency at which opera singers attended laryngologist appointments and voice rehabilitation. The second limb of the study was examination of the participants’ vocal folds. The most experienced ENT consultant in our Clinic performed a videolaryngoscopy with a rigid endoscope followed by a videostroboscopy (Hopkins II telescope 70 degrees, Karl Storz, Germany) in order to confirm or exclude vocal fold pathologies.

Data was then implemented into Statistica 13.1 (Statsoft Poland, Cracow) software. There were no missing values in our study. The primary hypothesis was that there is a relationship between the voice type and the prevalence of voice disorders. Statistical significance was reported at the alpha level of 0.05. P value below 0.05 was considered significant. While analyzing the data we performed the Kruskal–Wallis H test and the Mann–Whitney U test in order to study distributions of features and to determine if the differences between the distributions are statistically significant. Hypothesis tests were designed as two-tailed. A hypothesis null was formulated as H0 (the distribution of features in the groups is the same, i.e. there are no differences between opera singers with the different voice types) against the alternative hypothesis H1 (the distribution of features in the groups is not the same). The confidence intervals (CI) and standard deviations (SD) were established for the obtained values. We created categorized boxes and whisker diagrams with results of ANOVA, analysis of variance, to present our findings.

Results

We examined 70 highly professional opera singers, aged between 19 to 70 years old, with the average age of 41.77 years old (41.77,95%,CI:38.95-44.60,SD=11.85), divided into 7 study groups of 10 opera singers based on their voice types. From the initial group of 92, 22 singers were excluded, mostly because of chronic laryngeal reflux disease. There were not statistically significant differences in the distribution of age between the groups (H=2.27,P=.89) and singing experience, i.e. years of singing (H=3.07,P=.80).

The prevalence of voice disorders was the highest in the group of soprano singers, i.e. it was 50% (50%,95%,CI:12-88,SD=.53); they were two hematomas, two cases of voice fatigue and one case of nodules. A much lower prevalence of 20% (20%,95%,CI:10-50,SD=.42) was found for the group of countertenors (one case of voice fatigue and one of nodules), the same for tenors (one polyp and one case of nodules) and baritones (two cases of vocal edema). A prevalence of 10% (10%,95%,CI:13-33,SD=.32) was found for contralto singers as well as for mezzo-soprano singers (in both cases the pathologies were polyps). There were no vocal fold pathologies found amongst bass singers. Statistical significance was confirmed for difference between the group created from the highest female and the highest male voice, i.e. soprano and countertenor, and the group created from the lowest female and the lowest male voice, i.e. contralto and bass (Z=2.32,P=.02). Figure 1 shows it graphically

Legend of figures

Figure 1. The comparison of the prevalence of voice disorders between the groups of highest and lowest female and male voices.

Figure 1. Categorized box and whisker diagram with results of ANOVA, analysis of variance. The graph shows the comparison of mean values with standard error (SE) and standard deviation (SD) for the prevalence of voice disorders between the groups of highest female and male voices and lowest female and male voices.

Legend of figures:
Figure 2. The comparison of the frequency at which opera singers attend laryngological check-ups between the groups of singers with different types of voice (tessitura).

Figure 2. Categorized box and whisker diagram with results of ANOVA, analysis of variance. The graph shows the mean values with standard error (SE) and standard deviation (SD) for the frequency at which opera singers attend laryngological check-ups between the groups of singers with different types of voice (tessitura).

Legend of figures:
Figure 3. The comparison of the frequency at which opera singers attend voice rehabilitation between the groups of high voices (soprano, mezzo-soprano, countertenor, contralto and tenor) and low voices (baritone and bass).

Figure 3. Categorized box and whisker diagram with results of ANOVA, analysis of variance. The graph shows the comparison of mean values with standard error (SE) and standard deviation (SD) for the frequency at which opera singers attend voice rehabilitation between the groups of high voices (soprano, mezzo-soprano, countertenor, contralto and tenor singers) and low voices (baritone and bass singers).

Legend of figures:
Figure 4. The comparison of the frequency at which opera singers attend voice rehabilitation between the groups of two highest (soprano, mezzo-soprano) and two lowest (bass, baritone) voices.

 

Figure 4. Categorized box and whisker diagram with results of ANOVA, analysis of variance. The graph shows the comparison of mean values with standard error (SE) and standard deviation (SD) for the frequency at which opera singers attend voice rehabilitation between the groups of two highest (soprano, mezzo-soprano) and two lowest (bass, baritone) voices.

 

Bass and baritone singers were rarely (not more often than once per year) attending laryngological check-ups, and they were not attending any voice rehabilitation (nobody in both groups). In the other groups the frequencies of ENT appointments and voice rehabilitations were also low (mostly more rarely than once per year for ENT examinations with no habit of attending voice rehabilitations at all). In the group of tenors just one singer suffering from nodules reported attending laryngological appointments 4-5 times per year, as well as voice rehabilitation; one tenor suffering from polyp reported attending laryngological appointments 2 times per year, as well as voice rehabilitation; and two tenors with no vocal fold pathologies reported seeing laryngologists 1-2 times per year, however only one of them attends voice rehabilitation in order to improve singing technique. In the group of countertenors just one singer suffering from voice fatigue reported seeing a laryngologist 3 times per year and attends voice rehabilitation as well; and two countertenors see ENT doctors 1-2 times per year, however only one of them attends voice rehabilitation because of suffering from nodules.

The situation is quite similar in the case of female opera singers. In the group of contralto singers just one singer suffering from polyp claimed to see an ENT doctor 1-2 times per year and to attend voice rehabilitation. In the group of mezzo-soprano singers two persons declared seeing a laryngologist more often than once per year (2-3 times per year), despite a lack of voice disorders, and one singer declared attending voice rehabilitation because of suffering from polyp. The prevalence of regular laryngological visits was again the highest in the group of soprano singers: four of them claimed to see laryngologists 2 times per year despite a lack of voice disorders, one singer 3 times per year because of vocal fatigue, one 2 times per year, as well as attending voice rehabilitation, because of suffering from nodules, and two other singers claimed to attend voice rehabilitation because of suffering from hematoma and voice fatigue. Statistical significance of differences between all the groups was confirmed for attending laryngological appointments (H=15.73,P=.02), as well as for attending voice rehabilitation for comparisons between high and low voices, i.e. soprano and mezzo-soprano singers contra baritone and bass singers (Z=2.06,P=.04), and soprano, mezzo-soprano, countertenor, contralto and tenor singers contra baritone and bass singers (Z=2.26,P=.02). Figures 2-4 show it graphically.

Interestingly, a lot of opera singers claim to never attend laryngological check-ups, despite reporting high level of fear about their voices. As many as 20% (14 out of 70, 20%,95%,CI:18.88-21.12) opera singers in our study claim to never attend laryngological appointments (0 sopranos, 1 mezzo-soprano, 4 contraltos, 2 countertenors, 3 tenors, 1 baritone, 3 basses). The answer “rarely” or “very rarely” also appeared relatively often, in nearly 13% of our study group (9 out of 70, 13%,95%,CI:12.06-13.94) – once in the group of soprano, six times in the group of baritone, and two times in the group of bass. If we summarize these two findings, we can conclude that as many as nearly 33% of opera singers (23 out of 70, 33%,95%,CI:31.68-34.32) claim to never, very rarely or rarely attend laryngological appointments. 

Discussion

Our results confirmed the hypothesis, that there is a relationship between the type of voice that an opera singer has and the prevalence of vocal fold pathologies, i.e. in our study the prevalence of voice disorders was distinctly highest in the group of soprano singers and it dropped with the fundamental frequency of the singers’ tessitura (it was the lowest for the lowest voice, i.e. bass). There can be couple of reasons of this observation. Firstly, as we confirmed before in our different study, soprano singers’ vocal folds are the shortest, [40] and while singing they are being extended the most. At the same time they are also the most exposed to incredible strain while singing the highest frequencies. Finally, we are tempted to claim, that soprano parts play a special role in operas, and usually soprano arias are the longest and the most demanding, therefore affect vocal folds the most.

Our findings are in agreement with what we have observed during our years of providing medical support for the opera singers; however, several doubts warrant discussion. Firstly, there are differences between the singers that are difficult to evaluate, however might have affected their vocal folds. For example: lifestyle, addictions, living environment, individual differences between physiology and anatomy of the larynx, or performance technique and lack or presence of voice training. [8] Another doubt warrant discussion is the difficulty in comparing all types of voices, as they vary between the genders not only in pitch and vocal range, but also voice box anatomy. We decided the best way to evaluate prevalence of voice disorders in relation to voice type is to compare the group of singers with the highest female and the highest male voice with the group of singers with the lowest female and the lowest male voice. Statistical significance was confirmed for this difference. However, there is room left for further investigation and exploring this relationship for all the possible combinations of voice types.

From another point of view, we find the results related to the frequency of voice rehabilitation and laryngologists appointments very interesting. As we can see again, the higher the fundamental frequency of opera singers’ tessitura, the more frequent laryngological appointments and voice rehabilitations are. Presumably that might be connected to our first finding, i.e. the higher prevalence of voice disorders in the high voice group, however in future another study establishing the difference in consciousness about importance of voice care between the singers might be interesting. Nevertheless, what is the most surprising is the generally low frequency of laryngological appointments and voice rehabilitation in the group of opera singers, which is opposite to what has been described before.[32,46-48] Surprisingly, as many as 33% opera singers claim to never, very rarely or rarely see ENT specialists, despite the fact that it has become well accepted that they highly cherish their voices and worry about their condition a lot.[26,28] Expectedly, it raises the question of the reason of this outcome. We agree with Kwak et al. that the research about the effect of professional singing on the vocal folds is still very limited and the subject is still not exhausted. [8] This might be one reason why professional singers are unaware of the importance of regular laryngological examinations. Presumably, although they know the risk factors, they do not have specific knowledge about the actual significance of them (e.g. there is a high rate of opera singers who drink alcohol and smoke), as well as about which group of opera singers is more vulnerable to the voice disorders. Although the subject of professional singing seems to have received a reasonable amount of attention in scientific investigation, it is wide enough to still have some areas in which exploration is lacking. Kwak et al. explored changes in acoustic parameters before and after opera performances, however without evaluating long-term effects and without distinguishing singers’ voice types. [8] Phyland et al. checked the prevalence of voice disorders in singing groups in comparison to non-singing ones, and compared the groups singing in opera, musical theatre and “contemporary-other-than-rock” singing group, however did not compare the groups of singers with different tessitura. [28] Chernobelsky evaluated the results of voice therapy amongst professional classical singers with vocal fold nodules, but without dividing them by tessitura, and without evaluating the prevalence of this disorder. [27] Pacheco and Behlau investigated the immediate impact of vocal demand, but distinction according to tessitura was also beyond the scope of the research. [26] Mayerhoff et al. studied different types of tessitura, but only in the context of the presence of supraglottic hyperfunction not voice disorders, however they suggested the correlation between one and another. [49] Thus, we are tempted to claim that our research explores aspects not addressed before.

Conclusion

The beautiful voice which opera singers are characterized by is an amazing gift and instrument to make lots of people happy and fulfilled, including opera singers themselves while they follow their great passion of singing. However it is also a blessing that is easy to lose, simply because of following this passion. It is therefore also the subject of instant worry. However, because of the dearth of general knowledge in the subject, they are unaware of the actual risk for their vocal folds and the possible benefits of counteractions, and they don’t attend laryngologist appointments or voice rehabilitation enough. We believe it is therefore important for the population of opera singers to evaluate the actual risk that they are exposed to over the years of their career, which might encourage them to control their vocal folds more often and comfort them with regular voice rehabilitation. Our study attempted to start the process of this evaluation and to emphasize the importance of this subject.

Acknowledgement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors report no financial and material support for the research and the work reported in the manuscript.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad